Nietzsche Studien

595 papers and 717 indexed citations i.

About

The 595 papers published in Nietzsche Studien in the last decades have received a total of 717 indexed citations. Papers published in Nietzsche Studien usually cover Philosophy (263 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (125 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (19 papers) specifically the topics of Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (256 papers), German Literature and Culture Studies (122 papers) and Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (80 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nietzsche Studien are Thomas H. Brobjer, Werner Stegmaier, Wolfgang Müller-Lauter, Keith Ansell‐Pearson, Mazzino Montinari, Christa Davis Acampora, Herman Siemens, H. Baier, Volker Gerhardt and Bernd Magnus.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Nietzsche Studien

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nietzsche Studien. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nietzsche Studien.

Countries where authors publish in Nietzsche Studien

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nietzsche Studien. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nietzsche Studien with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nietzsche Studien more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025