Nietzsche Studien

624 papers and 872 indexed citations

About

The 624 papers published in Nietzsche Studien in the last decades have received a total of 872 indexed citations. Papers published in Nietzsche Studien usually cover Philosophy (275 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (136 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (20 papers) specifically the topics of Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (268 papers), German Literature and Culture Studies (132 papers) and Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (83 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nietzsche Studien are Thomas H. Brobjer, Werner Stegmaier, Wolfgang Müller-Lauter, Keith Ansell‐Pearson, Mazzino Montinari, Herman Siemens, H. Baier, Jonathan Barnes, Ernst Behler and Adrian Del.

In The Last Decade

Nietzsche Studien

159 papers receiving 312 citations

Fields of papers published in Nietzsche Studien

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nietzsche Studien. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nietzsche Studien.

Countries where authors publish in Nietzsche Studien

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nietzsche Studien. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nietzsche Studien with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nietzsche Studien more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026