Journal of Qur anic Studies

317 papers and 652 indexed citations i.

About

The 317 papers published in Journal of Qur anic Studies in the last decades have received a total of 652 indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Qur anic Studies usually cover Sociology and Political Science (224 papers), Political Science and International Relations (200 papers) and Social Psychology (149 papers) specifically the topics of Historical and Linguistic Studies (202 papers), Politics of Islamic Reform in Middle East (186 papers) and Families in Therapy and Culture (149 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Qur anic Studies are Walid A. Saleh, Muhammad Abdel Haleem, Angelika Neuwirth, Devin J. Stewart, Sajjad Rizvi, Christopher Melchert, Sophia Vasalou, Hussein Abdul-Raof, Abdullah Saeed and Elsaid M. Badawi.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Qur anic Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Qur anic Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Qur anic Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Qur anic Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Qur anic Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Qur anic Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Qur anic Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025