Forum der Psychoanalyse

536 papers and 991 indexed citations i.

About

The 536 papers published in Forum der Psychoanalyse in the last decades have received a total of 991 indexed citations. Papers published in Forum der Psychoanalyse usually cover Cultural Studies (315 papers), Clinical Psychology (260 papers) and Social Psychology (245 papers) specifically the topics of Psychoanalysis and Social Critique (315 papers), Psychology, Coaching, and Therapy (231 papers) and Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (197 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Forum der Psychoanalyse are Michael Ermann, Jürgen Körner, Michael B. Buchholz, Sven Olaf Hoffmann, Siegfried Zepf, Diana Pflichthofer, Inge Seiffge‐Krenke, Cord Benecke, David Tuckett and Mary Target.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Forum der Psychoanalyse

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Forum der Psychoanalyse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Forum der Psychoanalyse.

Countries where authors publish in Forum der Psychoanalyse

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Forum der Psychoanalyse. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Forum der Psychoanalyse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Forum der Psychoanalyse more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025