Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft

2.0k citations
755 papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

    • Biblical Studies and Interpretation
    • Theology and Canon Law Studies
    • Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies
  • Archeology top 5%
    • Archaeology and Historical Studies
    • Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies

Papers in

    • Biblical Studies and Interpretation 457
    • Theology and Canon Law Studies 130
    • Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies 84
    • Byzantine Studies and History 72

Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft

356 papers receiving 863 citations

Peers

Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Religious studies 1.6k
  • Archeology 935
  • Classics 210
  • Anthropology 314
  • Sociology and Political Science 882
Replace Journal for the Study of the New Testament with:
Journal for the Study of the New Testament United States
Biblical Theology Bulletin Journal of Bible and Culture United States
Biblical Interpretation United States
AJS Review The Journal of the Association for Jewish Studies United States
Journal of Semitic Studies United Kingdom
Journal for the Study of Judaism United States
Journal for the Study of the Old Testament United States
The Journal of Religion United States
Revue Théologique de Louvain
Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses Canada
Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft relative to Journal for the Study of the New Testament United States Journal for the Study of the New Testament's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Journal for the Study of the New Testament · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft.

About Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft

The 755 papers published in Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft in the last decades have received a total of 2.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft usually cover Religious studies (502 papers), Classics (145 papers), Archeology (212 papers), History (106 papers) and Philosophy (74 papers) specifically the topics of Biblical Studies and Interpretation (457 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (176 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (139 papers), Theology and Canon Law Studies (130 papers), Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (84 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (72 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (71 papers) and Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (67 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft are Martin Hengel, Joachim Jeremias, Georg Strecker, Werner Eck, Peter Schäfer, Heinrich Müller, Gerd Lüdemann, Joseph M. Gutmann, Carl Joachim Classen and Leander E. Keck.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact