Theoretical and Applied Ecology

418 papers and 604 indexed citations i.

About

The 418 papers published in Theoretical and Applied Ecology in the last decades have received a total of 604 indexed citations. Papers published in Theoretical and Applied Ecology usually cover Plant Science (52 papers), Soil Science (48 papers) and Ecology (39 papers) specifically the topics of Soil and Environmental Studies (46 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (27 papers) and Marine and environmental studies (26 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Theoretical and Applied Ecology are Олег Петрович Лопатин, V A Likhanov, А. А. Дымов, Evgeny Abakumov, Anatoly Prokushkin, Sophia Barınova, Yakov Kuzyakov, С. А. Рубцова, О. М. Цивилева and Allan E. Gross.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Theoretical and Applied Ecology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Theoretical and Applied Ecology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Theoretical and Applied Ecology.

Countries where authors publish in Theoretical and Applied Ecology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Theoretical and Applied Ecology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Theoretical and Applied Ecology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Theoretical and Applied Ecology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025