Thomas Elsaesser

136 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Thomas Elsaesser
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 327
  • Literature and Literary Theory 382
  • Economics and Econometrics 812
  • Music 68
  • Urban Studies 114
Replace Janet Staiger with:
Janet Staiger United States
Miriam Hansen Germany
Robert Stam United States
Bill Nichols United States
Jonathan Crary United Kingdom
Mary Ann Doane United States
Laura U. Marks Canada
André Bazin United States
Marsha Kinder United States
Kaja Silverman
Thomas Elsaesser relative to Janet Staiger United States Janet Staiger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Janet Staiger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Elsaesser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Elsaesser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Elsaesser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Elsaesser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Elsaesser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Elsaesser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Elsaesser. The network helps show where Thomas Elsaesser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Elsaesser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Elsaesser Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Elsaesser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 206 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992163
2 2009142
3 2005126
4 2005111
5 200567
6 200563
7 201257
8 201252
9 201649
10 200145
11
Tales of sound and fury: the family melodrama
197240
12 200533
13 200530
14
Cinema Futures: Cain, Abel or Cable?: The Screen Arts in the Digital Age
199826
15 201525
16
Filmtheorie zur Einführung
200724
17 199021
18 199620
19
Tales of sound and fury
198519
20 199819

About Thomas Elsaesser

Thomas Elsaesser is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, History and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 206 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cinema and Media Studies (66 papers), Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (49 papers), European history and politics (49 papers), German History and Society (23 papers), Art, Politics, and Modernism (9 papers), Digital Games and Media (9 papers), Visual Culture and Art Theory (8 papers) and French Historical and Cultural Studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Visual Arts and Performing Arts (327 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (382 citations), Economics and Econometrics (812 citations), Music (68 citations) and Urban Studies (114 citations). Thomas Elsaesser has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Malte Hagener, Donald Crafton, Jan Simons, David Martin‐Jones, Sarah Cooper, Noel King, Ruth Rentschler, Elena del Río, William Brown and Gertrud Koch. Their work appears in journals such as New Review of Film and Television Studies, Screen, German Studies Review, The German Quarterly and Critical Inquiry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact