Gesta
Impact in
Papers in
In The Last Decade
Gesta
343 papers receiving 923 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Classics 1.1k
- History 1.0k
- Archeology 683
- Anthropology 397
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 160
Countries where authors publish in Gesta
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Gesta. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Gesta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gesta more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Gesta
This network shows the impact of papers published in Gesta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Gesta.
About Gesta
The 570 papers published in Gesta in the last decades have received a total of 2.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Gesta usually cover Classics (322 papers), History (362 papers), Archeology (209 papers), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (41 papers) and History and Philosophy of Science (37 papers) specifically the topics of Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (284 papers), Medieval Literature and History (183 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (168 papers), Medieval Architecture and Archaeology (54 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (44 papers), Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (41 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (39 papers) and Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (36 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Gesta are John Lowden, Robert Ousterhout, Liz James, Cynthia Hahn, Annemarie Weyl Carr, Bissera V. Pentcheva, Paul J. Meyvaert, John L. Osborne, Gregory T. Armstrong and W. Eugene Kleinbauer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.