Countries where authors publish in Near Eastern Archaeology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Near Eastern Archaeology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Near Eastern Archaeology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Near Eastern Archaeology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Near Eastern Archaeology
This network shows the impact of papers published in Near Eastern Archaeology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Near Eastern Archaeology.
About Near Eastern Archaeology
The 687 papers published in Near Eastern Archaeology in the last decades have received a total of 4.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Near Eastern Archaeology usually cover Space and Planetary Science (135 papers), Archeology (547 papers), Paleontology (186 papers), Archeology (16 papers) and Religious studies (66 papers) specifically the topics of Archaeology and Historical Studies (366 papers), Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (238 papers), Ancient Near East History (201 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (186 papers), Archaeological Research and Protection (135 papers), Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (132 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (66 papers) and Maritime and Coastal Archaeology (35 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Near Eastern Archaeology are Edward B. Banning, Ömür Harmanşah, Jesse Casana, Israel Finkelstein, Amihai Mazar, Jason A. Ur, Gary Orin Rollefson, Avraham Faust, Pierre de Miroschedji and Thomas E. Levy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.