This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Iran. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Iran with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Iran more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Iran. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Iran.
About Iran
The 735 papers published in Iran in the last decades have received a total of 6.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Iran usually cover Archeology (454 papers), Anthropology (426 papers), Archeology (34 papers), Classics (78 papers) and Paleontology (75 papers) specifically the topics of Eurasian Exchange Networks (394 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (229 papers), Islamic Studies and History (229 papers), Ancient Near East History (209 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (77 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (75 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (59 papers) and Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (48 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Iran are T. Cuyler Young, Clifford Edmund Bosworth, David B Whitehouse, David Stronach, Louis Levine, James W. Allan, Brian Spooner, Julian Reade, Patricia Crone and P. R. S. Moorey.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.