Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research · 1×
×0.55k/9kARCHE
×1.0604/631SPS
×0.73k/4kPALEO
×0.7284/418ARCHE
×0.71k/2kANTHR
Citations per year
'16
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24
'25
'26
Countries where authors publish in Levant
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Levant. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Levant with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Levant more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Levant. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Levant.
About Levant
The 838 papers published in Levant in the last decades have received a total of 6.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Levant usually cover Space and Planetary Science (97 papers), Archeology (758 papers), Paleontology (264 papers), Archeology (20 papers) and Anthropology (101 papers) specifically the topics of Archaeology and Historical Studies (579 papers), Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (282 papers), Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (274 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (264 papers), Ancient Near East History (236 papers), Archaeological Research and Protection (97 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (60 papers) and Maritime and Coastal Archaeology (57 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Levant are Israel Finkelstein, Alison Betts, Graham Philip, S. W. Helms, Amihai Mazar, Andrew Garrard, Katherine Wright, Edgar Peltenburg, Cheryl A. Makarewicz and Piotr Bieńkowski.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.