Oxford Journal of Archaeology

913 papers and 7.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 913 papers published in Oxford Journal of Archaeology in the last decades have received a total of 7.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Oxford Journal of Archaeology usually cover Archeology (611 papers), Paleontology (404 papers) and Anthropology (328 papers) specifically the topics of Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (401 papers), Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (251 papers) and Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (148 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Oxford Journal of Archaeology are Julian Henderson, Andrew Sherratt, Tom Brughmans, Barry Cunliffe, Richard Bradley, Antony G. Brown, Yannis Hamilakis, Mark Gillings, Peter Bogucki and Paul G. Bahn.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Oxford Journal of Archaeology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Oxford Journal of Archaeology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Oxford Journal of Archaeology.

Countries where authors publish in Oxford Journal of Archaeology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Oxford Journal of Archaeology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Oxford Journal of Archaeology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Oxford Journal of Archaeology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025