Natural Products and Bioprospecting

591 papers and 8.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 591 papers published in Natural Products and Bioprospecting in the last decades have received a total of 8.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Natural Products and Bioprospecting usually cover Molecular Biology (303 papers), Pharmacology (184 papers) and Plant Science (153 papers) specifically the topics of Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (108 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (91 papers) and Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (71 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Natural Products and Bioprospecting are Ji‐Kai Liu, Jian Ding, Min Huang, Jin‐Jian Lu, Ying‐Jun Zhang, Mohd Yusuf, Mohd Shabbir, Faqeer Mohammad, Ming‐Hua Qiu and Joseph Sakah Kaunda.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Natural Products and Bioprospecting

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Natural Products and Bioprospecting. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Natural Products and Bioprospecting.

Countries where authors publish in Natural Products and Bioprospecting

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Natural Products and Bioprospecting. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Natural Products and Bioprospecting with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natural Products and Bioprospecting more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025