Small-scale Forestry

568 papers and 7.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 568 papers published in Small-scale Forestry in the last decades have received a total of 7.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Small-scale Forestry usually cover Global and Planetary Change (443 papers), Economics and Econometrics (94 papers) and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (80 papers) specifically the topics of Forest Management and Policy (306 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (286 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (84 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Small-scale Forestry are Laurène Feintrenie, Patrice Levang, Heimo Karppinen, John Herbohn, Raffaele Spinelli, Natascia Magagnotti, David B. Kittredge, Brett J. Butler, Makoto Inoue and Jacki Schirmer.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Small-scale Forestry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Small-scale Forestry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Small-scale Forestry.

Countries where authors publish in Small-scale Forestry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Small-scale Forestry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Small-scale Forestry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Small-scale Forestry more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025