Multicultural Perspectives

653 papers and 5.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 653 papers published in Multicultural Perspectives in the last decades have received a total of 5.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Multicultural Perspectives usually cover Education (412 papers), Sociology and Political Science (332 papers) and Linguistics and Language (70 papers) specifically the topics of Critical Race Theory in Education (181 papers), Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (145 papers) and Global Education and Multiculturalism (141 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Multicultural Perspectives are Francesina R. Jackson, Paul C. Gorski, Jason G. Irizarry, Michelle Jay, Alison G. Dover, Christine Clark, Wayne Au, Cinthia Salinas, Edith Guyton and Joseph E. Flynn.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Multicultural Perspectives

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Multicultural Perspectives. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Multicultural Perspectives.

Countries where authors publish in Multicultural Perspectives

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Multicultural Perspectives. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Multicultural Perspectives with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Multicultural Perspectives more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025