Investigative and Clinical Urology

685 papers and 5.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 685 papers published in Investigative and Clinical Urology in the last decades have received a total of 5.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Investigative and Clinical Urology usually cover Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (310 papers), Urology (243 papers) and Surgery (236 papers) specifically the topics of Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (158 papers), Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (139 papers) and Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (116 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Investigative and Clinical Urology are Brian R. Matlaga, Justin Ziemba, Ho Kyung Seo, Kyu‐Sung Lee, Hyung Suk Kim, Seung‐June Oh, Jayoung Kim, Wun‐Jae Kim, Amy Pearlman and Ryan Terlecki.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Investigative and Clinical Urology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Investigative and Clinical Urology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Investigative and Clinical Urology.

Countries where authors publish in Investigative and Clinical Urology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Investigative and Clinical Urology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Investigative and Clinical Urology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Investigative and Clinical Urology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025