Countries where authors publish in Microbial Physiology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Microbial Physiology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Microbial Physiology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Microbial Physiology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Microbial Physiology
This network shows the impact of papers published in Microbial Physiology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Microbial Physiology.
About Microbial Physiology
The 726 papers published in Microbial Physiology in the last decades have received a total of 21.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Microbial Physiology usually cover Genetics (299 papers), Biotechnology (66 papers), Microbiology (29 papers), Molecular Biology (256 papers) and Pollution (43 papers) specifically the topics of Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (292 papers), Enzyme Production and Characterization (51 papers), Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (39 papers), Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants (37 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (30 papers), Fungal and yeast genetics research (28 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (24 papers) and Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (22 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Microbial Physiology are Milton H. Saier, Luc De Vuyst, Frédéric Leroy, Julia M. Foght, Linda L. McCarter, François-Joël Gatesoupe, James Baligeh Walter Russell, Matthias Boll, Alain J. Cozzone and Josef Deutscher.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.