Critical Reviews in Microbiology

905 papers and 51.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 905 papers published in Critical Reviews in Microbiology in the last decades have received a total of 51.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Critical Reviews in Microbiology usually cover Molecular Biology (374 papers), Infectious Diseases (184 papers) and Epidemiology (149 papers) specifically the topics of Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (73 papers), Gut microbiota and health (71 papers) and Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (67 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Critical Reviews in Microbiology are T.E. Cloete, Chris W. Michiels, Salvador Rodrı́guez-Zaragoza, Daniel J. Diekema, Michael A. Pfaller, Roger C. Prince, Jos Vanderleyden, Jacques Theron, Rikke Louise Meyer and Souvik Sengupta.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Critical Reviews in Microbiology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Critical Reviews in Microbiology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Critical Reviews in Microbiology.

Countries where authors publish in Critical Reviews in Microbiology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Critical Reviews in Microbiology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Critical Reviews in Microbiology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Critical Reviews in Microbiology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025