Marketing Education Review

873 papers and 8.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 873 papers published in Marketing Education Review in the last decades have received a total of 8.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Marketing Education Review usually cover Management of Technology and Innovation (715 papers), Education (355 papers) and Accounting (284 papers) specifically the topics of Management and Marketing Education (705 papers), Accounting Education and Careers (272 papers) and Innovations in Educational Methods (175 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Marketing Education Review are Debra A. Laverie, Lawrence B. Chonko, Dennis E. Clayson, Debra A. Haley, O. C. Ferrell, Jana Bowden, James A. Muncy, Diana L. Haytko, Scott R. Swanson and Brian A. Vander Schee.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Marketing Education Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Marketing Education Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Marketing Education Review.

Countries where authors publish in Marketing Education Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Marketing Education Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Marketing Education Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marketing Education Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025