Movement Disorders Clinical Practice

18.2k citations
2.2k papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

  • Neurology top 5%
    • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
    • Neurological disorders and treatments
    • Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
    • Neurological diseases and metabolism
    • Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases

Papers in

    • Neurological disorders and treatments 648
    • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments 611
    • Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders 204
    • Neurological diseases and metabolism 122
    • Autoimmune Neurological Disorders and Treatments 121
    • Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases 399

Movement Disorders Clinical Practice

1.7k papers receiving 15.3k citations

Peers

Movement Disorders Clinical Practice
Comparison fields: 5 of 168
  • Neurology 10.1k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 3.8k
  • Neurology 1.3k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 1.6k
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 471
Replace Practical Neurology with:
Practical Neurology United Kingdom
Revue Neurologique France
Journal of Neuroscience Nursing United States
Revista de Neurología Spain
Acta Neurologica Belgica Türkiye
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders United States
Clinical Autonomic Research United States
Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology United States
International Journal of Stroke United States
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America United States
Movement Disorders Clinical Practice relative to Practical Neurology United Kingdom Practical Neurology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.0×
Practical Neurology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Movement Disorders Clinical Practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Movement Disorders Clinical Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Movement Disorders Clinical Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Movement Disorders Clinical Practice more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Movement Disorders Clinical Practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Movement Disorders Clinical Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Movement Disorders Clinical Practice.

About Movement Disorders Clinical Practice

The 2.2k papers published in Movement Disorders Clinical Practice in the last decades have received a total of 18.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Movement Disorders Clinical Practice usually cover Neurology (1.2k papers), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (485 papers), Neurology (195 papers), Rheumatology (149 papers) and Clinical Biochemistry (67 papers) specifically the topics of Neurological disorders and treatments (648 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (611 papers), Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (399 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (204 papers), Glycogen Storage Diseases and Myoclonus (138 papers), Neurological diseases and metabolism (122 papers), Autoimmune Neurological Disorders and Treatments (121 papers) and Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (106 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Movement Disorders Clinical Practice are Kailash P. Bhatia, Claudia Trenkwalder, Brit Mollenhauer, Sebastian Schade, Anthony E. Lang, Bettina Balint, Christos Ganos, Alfonso Fasano, Glenn T. Stebbins and Christopher G. Goetz.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact