Practical Neurology

1.4k papers and 14.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.4k papers published in Practical Neurology in the last decades have received a total of 14.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Practical Neurology usually cover Neurology (545 papers), Psychiatry and Mental health (240 papers) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (197 papers) specifically the topics of Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders (105 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (93 papers) and Autoimmune Neurological Disorders and Treatments (79 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Practical Neurology are Jon Stone, John Stewart, Kevin Talbot, Thomas A. Hughes, Michael O’Sullivan, Benjamin R. Wakerley, Neil Scolding, Astrid Nehlig, Gavin Giovannoni and Martin R. Turner.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Practical Neurology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Practical Neurology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Practical Neurology.

Countries where authors publish in Practical Neurology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Practical Neurology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Practical Neurology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Practical Neurology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025