Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology

2.8k papers and 30.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.8k papers published in Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology in the last decades have received a total of 30.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology usually cover Neurology (1.2k papers), Ophthalmology (1.1k papers) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (649 papers) specifically the topics of Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (522 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (448 papers) and Retinal and Optic Conditions (379 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology are Jonathan D. Trobe, Nancy J. Newman, Kathleen B. Digre, Neil R. Miller, Randy H. Kardon, Anthony C. Arnold, Valérie Biousse, Steven Galetta, Deborah I. Friedman and Laura J. Balcer.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025