Learning Research and Practice

2.1k citations
409 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

    • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods 47
    • Educational Strategies and Epistemologies 15
    • Education and Critical Thinking Development 28
    • Education and Technology Integration 23
    • Teacher Education and Leadership Studies 19
    • Online and Blended Learning 17

Learning Research and Practice

200 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Learning Research and Practice
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Health Informatics 107
  • Computer Science Applications 381
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 559
  • Education 1.0k
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 33
Replace ECNU Review of Education with:
ECNU Review of Education China
Information and Learning Sciences United States
Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism United States
Knowledge Management & E-Learning An International Journal United States
Education for Chemical Engineers Spain
Psychology Learning & Teaching United States
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly United States
International Journal of Information and Learning Technology United States
Australasian journal of engineering education Australia
The Journal of Educators Online United States
Learning Research and Practice relative to ECNU Review of Education China ECNU Review of Education's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×34×
ECNU Review of Education · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Learning Research and Practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Learning Research and Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Learning Research and Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Learning Research and Practice more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Learning Research and Practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Learning Research and Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Learning Research and Practice.

About Learning Research and Practice

The 409 papers published in Learning Research and Practice in the last decades have received a total of 2.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Learning Research and Practice usually cover Developmental and Educational Psychology (90 papers), Education (164 papers), Computer Science Applications (23 papers), Health Informatics (5 papers) and Human Factors and Ergonomics (9 papers) specifically the topics of Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (47 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (28 papers), Education and Technology Integration (23 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (19 papers), Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function (19 papers), Online and Blended Learning (17 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (17 papers) and Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (15 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Learning Research and Practice are Mike Sharples, Manu Kapur, Peter Reimann, Tim Gorichanaz, Alexander Renkl, Deanna Kuhn, Yılmaz Soysal, Barbara A. Hendrickson, Ching Sing Chai and Joyce Hwee Ling Koh.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact