Countries where authors publish in ECNU Review of Education
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in ECNU Review of Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in ECNU Review of Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ECNU Review of Education more than expected).
Fields of papers published in ECNU Review of Education
This network shows the impact of papers published in ECNU Review of Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in ECNU Review of Education.
About ECNU Review of Education
The 351 papers published in ECNU Review of Education in the last decades have received a total of 3.4k indexed citations . Papers published in ECNU Review of Education usually cover Education (179 papers), Demography (27 papers), Political Science and International Relations (75 papers), Information Systems (39 papers) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (16 papers) specifically the topics of Global Educational Policies and Reforms (48 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (30 papers), Higher Education Governance and Development (27 papers), Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities (27 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Education (19 papers), Education, Philosophy, and Society (17 papers), Education Pedagogy and Practices (16 papers) and Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (15 papers). The most active scholars publishing in ECNU Review of Education are Weipeng Yang, Jiahong Su, Xiaozhe Yang, Deoksoon Kim, Mark Bray, Wang Tao, Yong Zhao, Andreas Schleicher, Pak Tee Ng and Wei Zhang.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.