Studia Neophilologica

775 papers and 1.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 775 papers published in Studia Neophilologica in the last decades have received a total of 1.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Studia Neophilologica usually cover Language and Linguistics (334 papers), Classics (143 papers) and Literature and Literary Theory (119 papers) specifically the topics of Linguistics and language evolution (123 papers), Medieval Literature and History (105 papers) and Lexicography and Language Studies (86 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Studia Neophilologica are Susan Hegeman, Göran Kjellmer, Francisco Javier Martín Arista, Leonard Neidorf, Bengt Jacobsson, Juhani Rudanko, David Howlett, Peter J. Grund, Rafael J. Pascual and Teresa Fanego.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Studia Neophilologica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Studia Neophilologica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Studia Neophilologica.

Countries where authors publish in Studia Neophilologica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Studia Neophilologica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Studia Neophilologica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Studia Neophilologica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025