Law and Financial Markets Review

1.3k citations
310 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

  • Finance top 10%
    • Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
    • Global Financial Regulation and Crises
    • Corporate Finance and Governance
    • Islamic Finance and Banking Studies

Papers in

    • Global Financial Regulation and Crises 70
    • Banking stability, regulation, efficiency 51
    • Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism 19
    • State Capitalism and Financial Governance 31
    • Corporate Governance and Law 27

Law and Financial Markets Review

220 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Law and Financial Markets Review
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Finance 386
  • Accounting 332
  • Management Information Systems 214
  • Strategy and Management 313
  • Economics and Econometrics 297
Replace Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration with:
Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration United States
˜The œGeorgetown law journal United States
European Company and Financial Law Review Germany
Capital Markets Law Journal United States
Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium United States
Journal of Developing Societies United States
Research in Globalization Ghana
Policy Design and Practice Australia
Southeast Asian Economies Japan
Theoretical Inquiries in Law United States
Law and Financial Markets Review relative to Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration United States Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Law and Financial Markets Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Law and Financial Markets Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Law and Financial Markets Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Law and Financial Markets Review more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Law and Financial Markets Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Law and Financial Markets Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Law and Financial Markets Review.

About Law and Financial Markets Review

The 310 papers published in Law and Financial Markets Review in the last decades have received a total of 1.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Law and Financial Markets Review usually cover Finance (122 papers), Strategy and Management (87 papers), Accounting (61 papers), Law (43 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (48 papers) specifically the topics of Global Financial Regulation and Crises (70 papers), Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (51 papers), State Capitalism and Financial Governance (31 papers), Corporate Governance and Law (27 papers), Corporate Insolvency and Governance (25 papers), Insurance and Financial Risk Management (22 papers), Legal principles and applications (20 papers) and Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (19 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Law and Financial Markets Review are Thomas Clarke, Julia Black, Andrew Dahdal, Jon Truby, Richard Baldwin, Rafael Dean Brown, Rodney Maddock, Kevin Davis, Danny Busch and Iris H‐Y Chiu.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact