Southeast Asian Economies

320 papers and 2.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 320 papers published in Southeast Asian Economies in the last decades have received a total of 2.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Southeast Asian Economies usually cover General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (121 papers), Economics and Econometrics (84 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (76 papers) specifically the topics of Global trade and economics (107 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (34 papers) and Global Financial Crisis and Policies (34 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Southeast Asian Economies are Dan Slater, Neil M. Coe, Henry Wai‐chung Yeung, Francis E. Hutchinson, Sophal Ear, Jonathan Pincus, Armando Barrientos, Eve Warburton, Kai Ostwald and Gordon Redding.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Southeast Asian Economies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Southeast Asian Economies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Southeast Asian Economies.

Countries where authors publish in Southeast Asian Economies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Southeast Asian Economies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Southeast Asian Economies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Southeast Asian Economies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025