Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium

2.0k citations
268 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

  • Accounting top 10%
    • Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
    • Corporate Finance and Governance
    • Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
  • Finance top 10%
    • Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
    • Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism

Papers in

    • Banking stability, regulation, efficiency 46
    • Global Financial Regulation and Crises 26
    • Global Financial Crisis and Policies 21
    • Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance 49
    • Corporate Taxation and Avoidance 33
    • Corporate Finance and Governance 25

Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium

207 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Accounting 824
  • Finance 528
  • Public Administration 128
  • Management Information Systems 281
  • Strategy and Management 472
Replace Journal of Corporate Law Studies with:
Journal of Corporate Law Studies United Kingdom
Research in Accounting Regulation United States
Finance & development United States
UCLA law review United States
Journal of Economic Policy Reform United States
Economics of Governance United States
Southeast Asian Economies Japan
Journal of Asia-Pacific Business United States
˜The œGeorgetown law journal United States
Journal of Accounting Literature Australia
Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium relative to Journal of Corporate Law Studies United Kingdom Journal of Corporate Law Studies's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Journal of Corporate Law Studies · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium.

About Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium

The 268 papers published in Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium in the last decades have received a total of 2.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium usually cover Finance (91 papers), Accounting (102 papers), Management Information Systems (37 papers), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (30 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (80 papers) specifically the topics of Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (49 papers), Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (46 papers), Accounting and Organizational Management (33 papers), Corporate Taxation and Avoidance (33 papers), Global Financial Regulation and Crises (26 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (26 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (25 papers) and Global Financial Crisis and Policies (21 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium are Yuri Biondi, Jean-Philippe Robé, Lynn A. Stout, Riccardo Mussari, Olivier Weinstein, David Kennedy, Reuven S. Avi-Yonah, Thomas Clarke, Matthias Thiemann and Favourate Y. Mpofu.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact