Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium

1.7k citations
265 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

  • Accounting top 10%
    • Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
    • Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
    • Corporate Finance and Governance
  • Finance top 10%
    • Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
    • Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism

Papers in

    • Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance 49
    • Corporate Taxation and Avoidance 33
    • Corporate Finance and Governance 25
    • Banking stability, regulation, efficiency 46
    • Global Financial Regulation and Crises 25
    • Global Financial Crisis and Policies 21

Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium

202 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Accounting 791
  • Finance 498
  • Public Administration 110
  • Management Information Systems 251
  • Strategy and Management 402
Replace Journal of Corporate Law Studies with:
Journal of Corporate Law Studies United Kingdom
Research in Accounting Regulation United States
UCLA law review United States
˜The œGeorgetown law journal United States
Journal of Asia-Pacific Business United States
Finance & development United States
Portuguese Economic Journal Portugal
Journal of Economic Policy Reform United States
Theoretical Inquiries in Law United States
Revista de Contabilidad Spain
Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium relative to Journal of Corporate Law Studies United Kingdom Journal of Corporate Law Studies's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Journal of Corporate Law Studies · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium.

About Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium

The 265 papers published in Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium in the last decades have received a total of 1.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium usually cover Accounting (102 papers), Finance (90 papers), Management Information Systems (37 papers), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (30 papers) and Strategy and Management (44 papers) specifically the topics of Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (49 papers), Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (46 papers), Corporate Taxation and Avoidance (33 papers), Accounting and Organizational Management (33 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (26 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (25 papers), Global Financial Regulation and Crises (25 papers) and Global Financial Crisis and Policies (21 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium are Yuri Biondi, Jean-Philippe Robé, Lynn A. Stout, Riccardo Mussari, Olivier Weinstein, Reuven S. Avi-Yonah, Thomas Clarke, David Kennedy, Matthias Thiemann and Favourate Y. Mpofu.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact