Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium

1.9k citations
269 papers · · active since 2011

Impact in

  • Accounting top 5%
    • Accounting Theory and Financial Reporting
    • Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
    • Corporate Finance and Governance
    • Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
    • Taxation and Legal Issues
  • Finance top 10%
    • Banking stability, regulation, efficiency

Papers in

    • Accounting Theory and Financial Reporting 102
    • Corporate Finance and Governance 30
    • Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance 25
    • Taxation and Legal Issues 21
    • Banking stability, regulation, efficiency 26

Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium

232 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Accounting 1k
  • Finance 313
  • Strategy and Management 457
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 133
  • Management Information Systems 121
Replace European Company and Financial Law Review with:
European Company and Financial Law Review Germany
Journal of Asia-Pacific Business United States
Journal of Corporate Law Studies United Kingdom
Economic Annals Serbia
Journal of Economics Finance and Administrative Science Colombia
Yale journal on regulation United States
Risk Management and Insurance Review United States
International Review of Economics Italy
China Journal of Accounting Research China
American Law and Economics Review United States
Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium relative to European Company and Financial Law Review Germany European Company and Financial Law Review's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
European Company and Financial Law Review · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium.

About Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium

The 269 papers published in Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium in the last decades have received a total of 1.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium usually cover Accounting (169 papers), Finance (63 papers), Strategy and Management (51 papers), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (24 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (32 papers) specifically the topics of Accounting Theory and Financial Reporting (102 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (30 papers), Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (26 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (25 papers), Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (23 papers), Corporate Governance and Law (22 papers), Taxation and Legal Issues (21 papers) and Legal and Constitutional Studies (19 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium are Yuri Biondi, Jean-Philippe Robé, Lynn A. Stout, Riccardo Mussari, Olivier Weinstein, Thomas Clarke, Reuven S. Avi-Yonah, Matthias Thiemann, David L. Kennedy and Favourate Yelesedzani Mpofu.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact