Capital Markets Law Journal

1.1k citations
312 papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

  • Finance top 10%
    • Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
    • Global Financial Regulation and Crises
    • Global Financial Crisis and Policies
    • State Capitalism and Financial Governance
    • International Arbitration and Investment Law

Papers in

    • Global Financial Regulation and Crises 77
    • Banking stability, regulation, efficiency 38
    • Global Financial Crisis and Policies 30
    • Corporate Insolvency and Governance 34

Capital Markets Law Journal

217 papers receiving 737 citations

Peers

Capital Markets Law Journal
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Finance 495
  • Strategy and Management 362
  • Accounting 226
  • Management Information Systems 120
  • Economics and Econometrics 302
Replace Law and Financial Markets Review with:
Law and Financial Markets Review United Kingdom
Journal of Corporate Law Studies United Kingdom
Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium United States
UCLA law review United States
International Journal of Public Policy United States
˜The œGeorgetown law journal United States
Yale journal on regulation United States
Economics Management and Financial Markets United States
European Company and Financial Law Review Germany
Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration United States
Capital Markets Law Journal relative to Law and Financial Markets Review United Kingdom Law and Financial Markets Review's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×
Law and Financial Markets Review · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Capital Markets Law Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Capital Markets Law Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Capital Markets Law Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Capital Markets Law Journal more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Capital Markets Law Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Capital Markets Law Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Capital Markets Law Journal.

About Capital Markets Law Journal

The 312 papers published in Capital Markets Law Journal in the last decades have received a total of 1.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Capital Markets Law Journal usually cover Finance (135 papers), Accounting (80 papers), Strategy and Management (109 papers), Law (35 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (62 papers) specifically the topics of Global Financial Regulation and Crises (77 papers), State Capitalism and Financial Governance (53 papers), Corporate Governance and Law (41 papers), Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (38 papers), Corporate Insolvency and Governance (34 papers), International Arbitration and Investment Law (30 papers), Global Financial Crisis and Policies (30 papers) and Insurance and Financial Risk Management (26 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Capital Markets Law Journal are Danny Busch, Abba Kolo, T.W. Wälde, Iain G. MacNeil, Ian Ramsay, Mitu Gulati, Rosa Maria Lastra, Lee C. Buchheit, Edward F. Greene and Andrew Godwin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact