Capital Markets Law Journal

317 papers and 946 indexed citations i.

About

The 317 papers published in Capital Markets Law Journal in the last decades have received a total of 946 indexed citations. Papers published in Capital Markets Law Journal usually cover Finance (143 papers), Strategy and Management (119 papers) and Accounting (81 papers) specifically the topics of Global Financial Regulation and Crises (80 papers), State Capitalism and Financial Governance (58 papers) and Corporate Governance and Law (43 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Capital Markets Law Journal are Julia Black, Anna Gelpern, Lee C. Buchheit, Danny Busch, Mitu Gulati, E. F. Greene, Iain MacNeil, Ian Ramsay, Mark C. Weidemaier and Rosa M. Lastra.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Capital Markets Law Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Capital Markets Law Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Capital Markets Law Journal.

Countries where authors publish in Capital Markets Law Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Capital Markets Law Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Capital Markets Law Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Capital Markets Law Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025