Knowledge Management Research & Practice

19.7k citations
981 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

    • Knowledge Management and Sharing 392
    • Innovation and Knowledge Management 402
    • Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis 209
    • Business Strategy and Innovation 57

Knowledge Management Research & Practice

915 papers receiving 17.9k citations

Peers

Knowledge Management Research & Practice
Comparison fields: 5 of 176
  • Communication 6.6k
  • Strategy and Management 8.3k
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 2.8k
  • Business and International Management 724
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 2.8k
Replace Knowledge and Process Management with:
Knowledge and Process Management United States
The Learning Organization United States
The Information Society United States
IEEE Engineering Management Review United States
Science Technology & Human Values United States
Management Learning United Kingdom
Creativity and Innovation Management United States
International Studies of Management and Organization United Kingdom
Journal of Informetrics China
Strategy and Leadership United States
Knowledge Management Research & Practice relative to Knowledge and Process Management United States Knowledge and Process Management's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Knowledge and Process Management · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Knowledge Management Research & Practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Knowledge Management Research & Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Knowledge Management Research & Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Knowledge Management Research & Practice more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Knowledge Management Research & Practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Knowledge Management Research & Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Knowledge Management Research & Practice.

About Knowledge Management Research & Practice

The 981 papers published in Knowledge Management Research & Practice in the last decades have received a total of 19.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Knowledge Management Research & Practice usually cover Communication (399 papers), Strategy and Management (510 papers), Management of Technology and Innovation (158 papers), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (154 papers) and Business and International Management (27 papers) specifically the topics of Innovation and Knowledge Management (402 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (392 papers), Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis (209 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (73 papers), Organizational and Employee Performance (58 papers), Business Strategy and Innovation (57 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (53 papers) and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (46 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Knowledge Management Research & Practice are John Kidd, Ikujiro Nonaka, Ryoko Toyama, John S. Edwards, Hsiu‐Fen Lin, Vincent Ribière, Dianne P. Ford, Richard Baskerville, Alina Dulipovici and Yolande E. Chan.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact