Knowledge and Process Management

724 papers and 11.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 724 papers published in Knowledge and Process Management in the last decades have received a total of 11.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Knowledge and Process Management usually cover Strategy and Management (358 papers), Communication (253 papers) and Management Information Systems (195 papers) specifically the topics of Innovation and Knowledge Management (264 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (245 papers) and Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis (124 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Knowledge and Process Management are Paul Hendriks, Nick Bontis, Jay Liebowitz, Bart van den Hooff, Alexander Serenko, Daniel Prajogo, Nigel Holden, Rodney McAdam, Thomas H. Davenport and José Leomar Todesco.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Knowledge and Process Management

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Knowledge and Process Management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Knowledge and Process Management.

Countries where authors publish in Knowledge and Process Management

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Knowledge and Process Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Knowledge and Process Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Knowledge and Process Management more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025