Knowledge and Process Management

15.9k citations
745 papers · · active since 1997

Impact in

    • Knowledge Management and Sharing
    • Innovation and Knowledge Management
    • Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis
    • Management and Organizational Practices

Papers in

    • Knowledge Management and Sharing 280
    • Innovation and Knowledge Management 256
    • Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis 47
    • Management and Organizational Practices 28

Knowledge and Process Management

696 papers receiving 14.3k citations

Peers

Knowledge and Process Management
Comparison fields: 5 of 144
  • Communication 4.7k
  • Strategy and Management 6.1k
  • Management Information Systems 2.1k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 2k
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 1.1k
Replace Knowledge Management Research & Practice with:
Knowledge Management Research & Practice United States
International Studies of Management and Organization United Kingdom
Management and Organization Review China
The Learning Organization United States
Journal of International Management United States
Management International Review United Kingdom
Scandinavian Journal of Management Sweden
Journal of General Management United Kingdom
European Management Review United Kingdom
Measuring Business Excellence Italy
Knowledge and Process Management relative to Knowledge Management Research & Practice United States Knowledge Management Research & Practice's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Knowledge Management Research & Practice · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Knowledge and Process Management

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Knowledge and Process Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Knowledge and Process Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Knowledge and Process Management more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Knowledge and Process Management

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Knowledge and Process Management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Knowledge and Process Management.

About Knowledge and Process Management

The 745 papers published in Knowledge and Process Management in the last decades have received a total of 15.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Knowledge and Process Management usually cover Communication (286 papers), Strategy and Management (344 papers), Management Information Systems (148 papers), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (106 papers) and Business and International Management (6 papers) specifically the topics of Knowledge Management and Sharing (280 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (256 papers), Business Process Modeling and Analysis (88 papers), Knowledge Management and Technology (60 papers), Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis (47 papers), Organizational Learning and Leadership (43 papers), Information Architecture and Usability (36 papers) and Management and Organizational Practices (28 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Knowledge and Process Management are Paul Hendriks, Nick Bontis, Jay Liebowitz, Bart van den Hooff, Alexander Serenko, Nigel J. Holden, Daniel Indarto Prajogo, José Leomar Todesco, Vinícius Barreto Klein and Rodney McAdam.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact