Kant-Studien

4.7k citations
1.1k papers · · active since 1954

Impact in

  • Philosophy top 2%
    • Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
    • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
    • Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
    • Philosophy and Historical Thought

Papers in

    • Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations 939
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory 56
    • Philosophy and Historical Thought 46
    • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 40
    • Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel 29
    • Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought 28
    • Classical Philosophy and Thought 28

Kant-Studien

723 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Peers

Kant-Studien
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Philosophy 3.8k
  • Theoretical Computer Science 92
  • History and Philosophy of Science 312
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 231
  • General Social Sciences 46
Replace The Modern Schoolman with:
The Modern Schoolman United States
Ancient Philosophy United States
Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie United States
Transactions of the Charles S Peirce Society United States
Phronesis United States
Informal Logic United States
Revue Philosophique de Louvain France
Theoria United States
American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly United States
British Journal for the History of Philosophy United States
Kant-Studien relative to The Modern Schoolman United States The Modern Schoolman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.5×
The Modern Schoolman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Kant-Studien

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Kant-Studien. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Kant-Studien with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kant-Studien more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Kant-Studien

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Kant-Studien. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Kant-Studien.

About Kant-Studien

The 1.1k papers published in Kant-Studien in the last decades have received a total of 4.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Kant-Studien usually cover Philosophy (1k papers), Theoretical Computer Science (11 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (51 papers), History and Philosophy of Science (22 papers) and History (15 papers) specifically the topics of Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations (939 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (56 papers), Philosophy and Historical Thought (46 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (40 papers), Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (39 papers), Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (29 papers), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (28 papers) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (28 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Kant-Studien are Dieter Henrich, Klaus Düsing, Karl Ameriks, Thomas E. Hill, Friedrich Kaulbach, Samuel Fleischacker, MARTIN J. CARRIER, Andrews Reath, Pauline Kleingeld and Giorgio Tonelli.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact