Informal Logic

675 papers and 5.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 675 papers published in Informal Logic in the last decades have received a total of 5.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Informal Logic usually cover Philosophy (261 papers), Artificial Intelligence (160 papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (111 papers) specifically the topics of Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (136 papers), Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (110 papers) and Education and Critical Thinking Development (90 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Informal Logic are Peter A. Facione, Robert H. Ennis, Robert J. Fogelin, Axel Gelfert, Douglas Walton, Nicholas Rescher, Richard Paul, Trudy Govier, David Hitchcock and Harvey Siegel.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Informal Logic

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Informal Logic. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Informal Logic.

Countries where authors publish in Informal Logic

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Informal Logic. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Informal Logic with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Informal Logic more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025