This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Phronesis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Phronesis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phronesis more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Phronesis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Phronesis.
About Phronesis
The 1.0k papers published in Phronesis in the last decades have received a total of 13.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Phronesis usually cover Philosophy (845 papers), Archeology (323 papers), Anthropology (306 papers), History and Philosophy of Science (71 papers) and Theoretical Computer Science (16 papers) specifically the topics of Classical Philosophy and Thought (812 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (316 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (290 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (183 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (75 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (52 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (28 papers) and Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods (24 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Phronesis are David N. Sedley, Julia Annas, A. A. Long, Robert Heinaman, Alan C. Lloyd, Jaap Mansfeld, Christopher John Gill, Victor Caston, J. C. B. Gosling and Susanne Bobzien.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.