The Antiquaries Journal

1.2k papers and 3.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in The Antiquaries Journal in the last decades have received a total of 3.3k indexed citations. Papers published in The Antiquaries Journal usually cover Archeology (329 papers), History (267 papers) and Anthropology (170 papers) specifically the topics of Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (118 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (113 papers) and Medieval Literature and History (109 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Antiquaries Journal are D. P. S. Peacock, Martin Biddle, Barry Cunliffe, Richard Bradley, Henry Hurst, Michael Fulford, Stuart Needham, J. R. L. Allen, I. M. Stead and George C. Boon.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Antiquaries Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Antiquaries Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Antiquaries Journal.

Countries where authors publish in The Antiquaries Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Antiquaries Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Antiquaries Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Antiquaries Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025