The Journal of Roman Studies

1.7k papers and 10.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.7k papers published in The Journal of Roman Studies in the last decades have received a total of 10.9k indexed citations. Papers published in The Journal of Roman Studies usually cover Anthropology (934 papers), Archeology (742 papers) and History (373 papers) specifically the topics of Classical Antiquity Studies (899 papers), Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (371 papers) and Archaeology and Historical Studies (236 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Journal of Roman Studies are Lucia Nixon, Fergus Millar, Walter Scheidel, Peter Brown, P. A. Brunt, Gian Biagio Conte, Keith Hopkins, Brent D. Shaw, Andrew Wallace‐Hadrill and R. R. R. Smith.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Journal of Roman Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Journal of Roman Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Journal of Roman Studies.

Countries where authors publish in The Journal of Roman Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Journal of Roman Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Journal of Roman Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Journal of Roman Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025