Journal of Software Evolution and Process

11.3k citations
930 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

  • Software top 2%
    • Software Reliability and Analysis Research
    • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
    • Software Engineering Research
    • Software Engineering Techniques and Practices

Papers in

    • Software Reliability and Analysis Research 247
    • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques 128
    • Software Engineering Research 545
    • Software Engineering Techniques and Practices 389

Journal of Software Evolution and Process

841 papers receiving 10.8k citations

Peers

Journal of Software Evolution and Process
Comparison fields: 5 of 154
  • Software 3.2k
  • Information Systems 8.3k
  • Computer Science Applications 1.3k
  • Management Information Systems 1.6k
  • Computer Networks and Communications 2.5k
Replace Software Quality Journal with:
Software Quality Journal United States
Requirements Engineering United Kingdom
Advances in computers United States
International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering China
Automated Software Engineering United States
Human-Computer Interaction United States
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction United States
AI Magazine United States
Interacting with Computers United Kingdom
IET Software China
Journal of Software Evolution and Process relative to Software Quality Journal United States Software Quality Journal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Software Quality Journal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Software Evolution and Process

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Software Evolution and Process. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Software Evolution and Process with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Software Evolution and Process more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Journal of Software Evolution and Process

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Software Evolution and Process. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Software Evolution and Process.

About Journal of Software Evolution and Process

The 930 papers published in Journal of Software Evolution and Process in the last decades have received a total of 11.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Software Evolution and Process usually cover Software (327 papers), Information Systems (750 papers), Computer Science Applications (127 papers), Management Information Systems (157 papers) and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (78 papers) specifically the topics of Software Engineering Research (545 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (389 papers), Software Reliability and Analysis Research (247 papers), Software System Performance and Reliability (154 papers), Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (128 papers), Open Source Software Innovations (118 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (106 papers) and Business Process Modeling and Analysis (71 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Software Evolution and Process are Denys Poshyvanyk, Malcom Gethers, Meghan Revelle, Bogdan Dit, Philippe Kruchten, Jan Bosch, Arif Ali Khan, Mahmood Niazi, Claes Wohlin and Samireh Jalali.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact