Automated Software Engineering

15.2k citations
749 papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

  • Software top 1%
    • Software Reliability and Analysis Research
    • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
    • Software Engineering Research
    • Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services
    • Software Engineering Techniques and Practices

Papers in

    • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques 203
    • Software Reliability and Analysis Research 167
    • Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques 76
    • Software Engineering Research 317

Automated Software Engineering

664 papers receiving 14.2k citations

Peers

Automated Software Engineering
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
  • Software 7.4k
  • Information Systems 9.2k
  • Artificial Intelligence 6.4k
  • Computer Networks and Communications 3.8k
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 2.1k
Replace Advances in computers with:
Advances in computers United States
The Journal of Object Technology United States
Software Quality Journal United States
Software Testing Verification and Reliability United States
Journal of Visual Languages & Computing United States
Formal Aspects of Computing United Kingdom
IET Software China
Computer Science Review India
International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer Germany
Requirements Engineering United Kingdom
Automated Software Engineering relative to Advances in computers United States Advances in computers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.7×
Advances in computers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Automated Software Engineering

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Automated Software Engineering. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Automated Software Engineering with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Automated Software Engineering more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Automated Software Engineering

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Automated Software Engineering. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Automated Software Engineering.

About Automated Software Engineering

The 749 papers published in Automated Software Engineering in the last decades have received a total of 15.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Automated Software Engineering usually cover Software (341 papers), Information Systems (440 papers), Artificial Intelligence (321 papers), Computer Networks and Communications (187 papers) and Signal Processing (79 papers) specifically the topics of Software Engineering Research (317 papers), Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (203 papers), Software Reliability and Analysis Research (167 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (157 papers), Software System Performance and Reliability (108 papers), Formal Methods in Verification (85 papers), Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques (76 papers) and Advanced Malware Detection Techniques (74 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Automated Software Engineering are Klaus Havelund, Willem I. Visser, Flavio Lerda, Guillaume P. Brat, Seungjoon Park, Gerhard Fischer, Robert J. Hall, Tim Menzies, Xiao‐Yuan Jing and John Grundy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact