Automated Software Engineering

618 papers and 7.2k indexed citations

About

The 618 papers published in Automated Software Engineering in the last decades have received a total of 7.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Automated Software Engineering usually cover Information Systems (386 papers), Artificial Intelligence (280 papers) and Software (278 papers) specifically the topics of Software Engineering Research (280 papers), Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (166 papers) and Software Reliability and Analysis Research (143 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Automated Software Engineering are Klaus Havelund, Willem Visser, Guillaume Brat, Flavio Lerda, Seungjoon Park, Xiao‐Yuan Jing, Gerhard Fischer, Tim Menzies, Robert J. Hall and Zhiwu Zhang.

In The Last Decade

Automated Software Engineering

528 papers receiving 6.7k citations

Fields of papers published in Automated Software Engineering

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Automated Software Engineering. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Automated Software Engineering.

Countries where authors publish in Automated Software Engineering

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Automated Software Engineering. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Automated Software Engineering with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Automated Software Engineering more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026