Software Quality Journal

815 papers and 9.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 815 papers published in Software Quality Journal in the last decades have received a total of 9.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Software Quality Journal usually cover Information Systems (600 papers), Software (451 papers) and Artificial Intelligence (185 papers) specifically the topics of Software Engineering Research (488 papers), Software Reliability and Analysis Research (347 papers) and Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (268 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Software Quality Journal are Nigel Bevan, Ahmed Seffah, Mario Piattini, Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar, Tracy Hall, Du Zhang, Rex B. Kline, Harkirat Padda, Witold Suryn and Ayşe Bener.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Software Quality Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Software Quality Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Software Quality Journal.

Countries where authors publish in Software Quality Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Software Quality Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Software Quality Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Software Quality Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025