Software Quality Journal

15.7k citations
848 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

  • Software top 1%
    • Software Reliability and Analysis Research
    • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
    • Software Engineering Research
    • Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
    • Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services

Papers in

    • Software Reliability and Analysis Research 354
    • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques 238
    • Software Engineering Research 497
    • Software Engineering Techniques and Practices 270
    • Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services 57

Software Quality Journal

781 papers receiving 14.4k citations

Peers

Software Quality Journal
Comparison fields: 5 of 178
  • Software 7.0k
  • Information Systems 10.7k
  • Management Information Systems 1.7k
  • Computer Science Applications 1.0k
  • Computer Networks and Communications 3.2k
Replace Advances in computers with:
Advances in computers United States
Journal of Software Evolution and Process China
International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering China
Requirements Engineering United Kingdom
Automated Software Engineering United States
Software & Systems Modeling Germany
Journal of Visual Languages & Computing United States
IET Software China
AI Magazine United States
ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology China
Software Quality Journal relative to Advances in computers United States Advances in computers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
Advances in computers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Software Quality Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Software Quality Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Software Quality Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Software Quality Journal more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Software Quality Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Software Quality Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Software Quality Journal.

About Software Quality Journal

The 848 papers published in Software Quality Journal in the last decades have received a total of 15.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Software Quality Journal usually cover Software (465 papers), Information Systems (613 papers), Management Information Systems (87 papers), Computer Science Applications (47 papers) and Computer Networks and Communications (149 papers) specifically the topics of Software Engineering Research (497 papers), Software Reliability and Analysis Research (354 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (270 papers), Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (238 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (135 papers), Software System Performance and Reliability (126 papers), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (57 papers) and Advanced Malware Detection Techniques (45 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Software Quality Journal are Nigel Bevan, Ahmed Seffah, Mario Piattini, Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar, Tracy Hall, Rex B. Kline, Harkirat Padda, Markus Pizka, Florian Deissenboeck and Witold Suryn.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact