Software Quality Journal

13.7k citations
841 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

  • Software top 0.5%
    • Software Reliability and Analysis Research
    • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
    • Software Engineering Research
    • Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
    • Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services

Papers in

    • Software Reliability and Analysis Research 353
    • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques 234
    • Software Engineering Research 494
    • Software Engineering Techniques and Practices 270
    • Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services 57

Software Quality Journal

769 papers receiving 12.6k citations

Peers

Software Quality Journal
Comparison fields: 5 of 173
  • Software 6.3k
  • Information Systems 9.4k
  • Computer Science Applications 896
  • Management Information Systems 1.4k
  • Computer Networks and Communications 2.9k
Replace Journal of Software Evolution and Process with:
Journal of Software Evolution and Process China
International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering China
Automated Software Engineering United States
Software & Systems Modeling Germany
IET Software China
Journal of Visual Languages & Computing United States
ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology China
AI Magazine United States
The Knowledge Engineering Review United Kingdom
Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research United States
Software Quality Journal relative to Journal of Software Evolution and Process China Journal of Software Evolution and Process's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Journal of Software Evolution and Process · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Software Quality Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Software Quality Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Software Quality Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Software Quality Journal more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Software Quality Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Software Quality Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Software Quality Journal.

About Software Quality Journal

The 841 papers published in Software Quality Journal in the last decades have received a total of 13.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Software Quality Journal usually cover Software (461 papers), Information Systems (610 papers), Management Information Systems (87 papers), Computer Science Applications (46 papers) and Computer Networks and Communications (148 papers) specifically the topics of Software Engineering Research (494 papers), Software Reliability and Analysis Research (353 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (270 papers), Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (234 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (134 papers), Software System Performance and Reliability (126 papers), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (57 papers) and Advanced Malware Detection Techniques (44 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Software Quality Journal are Nigel Bevan, Ahmed Seffah, Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar, Mario Piattini, Markus Pizka, Florian Deissenboeck, Tracy Hall, Rex B. Kline, Harkirat Padda and Witold Suryn.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact