This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Intermetallics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Intermetallics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Intermetallics more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Intermetallics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Intermetallics.
About Intermetallics
The 6.6k papers published in Intermetallics in the last decades have received a total of 190.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Intermetallics usually cover Mechanical Engineering (5.4k papers), General Materials Science (423 papers), Ceramics and Composites (683 papers), Materials Chemistry (3.3k papers) and Condensed Matter Physics (715 papers) specifically the topics of Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties (2.8k papers), Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys (1.3k papers), High Entropy Alloys Studies (1.1k papers), High-Temperature Coating Behaviors (974 papers), MXene and MAX Phase Materials (828 papers), Semiconductor materials and interfaces (622 papers), Rare-earth and actinide compounds (601 papers) and Advanced materials and composites (598 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Intermetallics are C.T. Liu, D.B. Miracle, O.N. Senkov, G.B. Wilks, E.P. George, Peter K. Liaw, Gerhard Sauthoff, Xinhua Wu, Robert W. Cahn and S.C. Deevi.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.