This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Intermetallics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Intermetallics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Intermetallics more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Intermetallics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Intermetallics.
About Intermetallics
The 6.7k papers published in Intermetallics in the last decades have received a total of 197.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Intermetallics usually cover Mechanical Engineering (5.5k papers), General Materials Science (423 papers), Ceramics and Composites (686 papers), Materials Chemistry (3.3k papers) and Condensed Matter Physics (718 papers) specifically the topics of Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties (2.8k papers), Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys (1.3k papers), High Entropy Alloys Studies (1.2k papers), High-Temperature Coating Behaviors (981 papers), MXene and MAX Phase Materials (830 papers), Semiconductor materials and interfaces (623 papers), Rare-earth and actinide compounds (603 papers) and Advanced materials and composites (601 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Intermetallics are Chain Tsuan Liu, Daniel B. Miracle, Oleg N. Senkov, G.B. Wilks, Easo P. George, Peter Kaehuei Liaw, Gerhard Sauthoff, Xinhua Wu, S.C. Deevi and Martin Palm.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.