Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik

647 papers and 3.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 647 papers published in Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik in the last decades have received a total of 3.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik usually cover Education (521 papers), Language and Linguistics (123 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (105 papers) specifically the topics of Education Methods and Technologies (365 papers), Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (331 papers) and Linguistic Education and Pedagogy (116 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik are Katja Maaß, Werner Blum, Aiso Heinze, Susanne Prediger, Christiane Benz, Ulrich Kortenkamp, Dominik Leiß, Rudolf vom Hofe, Rita Borromeo Ferri and Gila Hanna.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik.

Countries where authors publish in Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025