Critique internationale

935 papers and 3.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 935 papers published in Critique internationale in the last decades have received a total of 3.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Critique internationale usually cover Political Science and International Relations (435 papers), Sociology and Political Science (417 papers) and Anthropology (114 papers) specifically the topics of Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender (226 papers), French Urban and Social Studies (91 papers) and Political and Social Issues (89 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Critique internationale are Jean-François Bayart, Cédric Mayrargue, Béatrice Hibou, Antoine Pécoud, Jérôme Sgard, Philippe Bezes, Marie‐Claire Lavabre, Christine Musselin, Peter Geschiere and Laurent Gayer.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Critique internationale

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Critique internationale. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Critique internationale.

Countries where authors publish in Critique internationale

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Critique internationale. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Critique internationale with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Critique internationale more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025