Transnational Corporation Review

465 papers and 3.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 465 papers published in Transnational Corporation Review in the last decades have received a total of 3.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Transnational Corporation Review usually cover Strategy and Management (205 papers), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (182 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (177 papers) specifically the topics of Global trade and economics (150 papers), International Business and FDI (138 papers) and Economic Growth and Development (48 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Transnational Corporation Review are Элинор Остром, James Testa, Ken Davies, Daniel Agyapong, Malik Shahzad Shabbir, Daniel Sakyi, Issouf Soumaré, K. V. Bhanu Murthy, Karl P. Sauvant and Fulbert Tchana Tchana.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Transnational Corporation Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Transnational Corporation Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Transnational Corporation Review.

Countries where authors publish in Transnational Corporation Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Transnational Corporation Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Transnational Corporation Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Transnational Corporation Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025