The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era

627 citations
332 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • American History and Culture
    • Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes

Papers in

    • American History and Culture 133
    • Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes 23
    • American Political and Social Dynamics 16

The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era

183 papers receiving 440 citations

Peers

The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Marketing 133
  • History 100
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 13
  • Sociology and Political Science 313
  • History and Philosophy of Science 32
Replace Pennsylvania History A Journal of Mid-Atlantic Studies with:
Pennsylvania History A Journal of Mid-Atlantic Studies United States
Southern cultures United States
American Nineteenth Century History United States
OAH Magazine of History United States
Spiritus Brazil
Early American studies United States
History Australia Australia
Berliner Journal für Soziologie Germany
American Journal of Cultural Sociology United States
L Année sociologique France
The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era relative to Pennsylvania History A Journal of Mid-Atlantic Studies United States Pennsylvania History A Journal of Mid-Atlantic Studies's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Pennsylvania History A Journal of Mid-Atlantic Studies · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era more than expected).

Fields of papers published in The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era.

About The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era

The 332 papers published in The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era in the last decades have received a total of 627 indexed citations . Papers published in The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era usually cover Marketing (133 papers), History (73 papers), Cultural Studies (34 papers), Sociology and Political Science (179 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (94 papers) specifically the topics of American History and Culture (133 papers), Race, History, and American Society (105 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (62 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (29 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (23 papers), Asian American and Pacific Histories (22 papers), American Political and Social Dynamics (16 papers) and Latin American and Latino Studies (15 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era are Robert D. Johnston, Paul A. Kramer, Erika Lee, R. Dudley Edwards, Philip J. Deloria, Richard R. John, Elisabeth Israels Perry, Ballard C. Campbell, Julie Greene and Lloyd E. Ambrosius.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact