The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era

765 citations
355 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • American History and Culture
    • Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes

Papers in

    • American History and Culture 146
    • Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes 25
    • American Political and Social Dynamics 17

The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era

200 papers receiving 506 citations

Peers

The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Marketing 158
  • History 129
  • Sociology and Political Science 390
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 13
  • History and Philosophy of Science 35
Replace Pennsylvania History A Journal of Mid-Atlantic Studies with:
Pennsylvania History A Journal of Mid-Atlantic Studies United States
Southern cultures United States
Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie Germany
American Nineteenth Century History United States
Early American studies United States
Spiritus United States
European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology United States
Religion and American Culture A Journal of Interpretation United States
Soziale Welt Germany
Sport in History United Kingdom
The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era relative to Pennsylvania History A Journal of Mid-Atlantic Studies United States Pennsylvania History A Journal of Mid-Atlantic Studies's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Pennsylvania History A Journal of Mid-Atlantic Studies · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era more than expected).

Fields of papers published in The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era.

About The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era

The 355 papers published in The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era in the last decades have received a total of 765 indexed citations . Papers published in The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era usually cover Marketing (146 papers), History (77 papers), Cultural Studies (37 papers), Sociology and Political Science (191 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (101 papers) specifically the topics of American History and Culture (146 papers), Race, History, and American Society (114 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (67 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (33 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (25 papers), Asian American and Pacific Histories (24 papers), American Political and Social Dynamics (17 papers) and Historical Economic and Social Studies (15 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era are Paul A. Kramer, Robert D. Johnston, Erika Lee, R. Dudley Edwards, Elisabeth Israels Perry, Ballard C. Campbell, Philip J. Deloria, Julie Greene, Richard R. John and Lloyd E. Ambrosius.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact