Early American studies

318 papers and 559 indexed citations i.

About

The 318 papers published in Early American studies in the last decades have received a total of 559 indexed citations. Papers published in Early American studies usually cover Anthropology (123 papers), Political Science and International Relations (114 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (91 papers) specifically the topics of American Constitutional Law and Politics (111 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (89 papers) and American History and Culture (74 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Early American studies are Jane Mt. Pleasant, Victor Enthoven, Britt Rusert, Peter H. Wood, Alison Games, Carla Gardina Pestana, David Waldstreicher, Matthew Mulcahy, Stephen Mihm and Ken MacMillan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Early American studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Early American studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Early American studies.

Countries where authors publish in Early American studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Early American studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Early American studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Early American studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025