Paul A. Kramer
Impact in
- Cultural Studies top 1%
- Asian American and Pacific Histories
- Anthropology top 5%
- Philippine History and Culture
Papers in
-
- Race, History, and American Society 7
- Australian History and Society 6
-
- Asian American and Pacific Histories 12
- Co-authors
- Dennis J. Chapron (9 shared papers)Anne L. Foster (1 shared paper)John R. Raye (6 shared papers)Mark Mirochnick (3 shared papers)J.M. Tanzer (4 shared papers)Kevin Sweeney (2 shared papers)Peter D. Masso (1 shared paper)Irving H. Gomolin (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (3 papers)Diplomatic History (3 papers)Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (3 papers)International Journal of Pharmaceutics (2 papers)The American Historical Review (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyMyanmar
In The Last Decade
Paul A. Kramer
56 papers receiving 691 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
- Cultural Studies 124
- Anthropology 105
- Pharmacology 75
- History 94
- Sociology and Political Science 324
Countries citing papers authored by Paul A. Kramer
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul A. Kramer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul A. Kramer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul A. Kramer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul A. Kramer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul A. Kramer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul A. Kramer. The network helps show where Paul A. Kramer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Paul A. Kramer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 139 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 118 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 61 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 61 | |
| 5 | 1988 | 59 | |
| 6 | 1986 | 54 | |
| 7 | 1982 | 41 | |
| 8 | 1978 | 39 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 39 | |
| 10 | 1984 | 39 | |
| 11 | 1981 | 21 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 19 | |
| 13 | 2001 | 18 | |
| 14 | 1995 | 17 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 15 | |
| 16 | 1994 | 15 | |
| 17 | 1999 | 14 | |
| 18 | 1992 | 14 | |
| 19 | 1984 | 12 | |
| 20 | 1980 | 12 |
About Paul A. Kramer
Paul A. Kramer is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cultural Studies, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Anthropology and Physiology, having authored 61 papers that have together received 984 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Asian American and Pacific Histories (12 papers), Race, History, and American Society (7 papers), Philippine History and Culture (6 papers), Australian History and Society (6 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (3 papers), Neonatal Health and Biochemistry (3 papers), Higher Education Governance and Development (3 papers) and Epilepsy research and treatment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (124 citations), Anthropology (105 citations), Pharmacology (75 citations), History (94 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (324 citations). Paul A. Kramer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Myanmar. Frequent co-authors include Dennis J. Chapron, Anne L. Foster, John R. Raye, Mark Mirochnick, J.M. Tanzer, Kevin Sweeney, Peter D. Masso, Irving H. Gomolin, Peter U. Feig and John Plotz. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Diplomatic History, Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, International Journal of Pharmaceutics and The American Historical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.