Ümit Topaloĝlu

96 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Ümit Topaloĝlu's Hit Papers

Using a Federated Network of Real-World Data to Optimize Clinical Trials Operations 2018 · 219 citations
2190+2+5Years since publication50100150200

Peers

Ümit Topaloĝlu
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
  • Health Informatics 34
  • Toxicology 80
  • Health Information Management 84
  • Oncology 286
  • Cancer Research 153
Replace Ju Han Kim with:
Ju Han Kim South Korea
Heng Luo China
Yves A. Lussier United States
Naoki Nakashima Japan
Rae Woong Park South Korea
Shuang Wang China
Ahmed Sultan Egypt
Anil Jain United States
Jörg Kreuzer Germany
Fiorella Guadagni Italy
Ümit Topaloĝlu relative to Ju Han Kim South Korea Ju Han Kim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Ju Han Kim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ümit Topaloĝlu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ümit Topaloĝlu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ümit Topaloĝlu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ümit Topaloĝlu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ümit Topaloĝlu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ümit Topaloĝlu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ümit Topaloĝlu. The network helps show where Ümit Topaloĝlu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ümit Topaloĝlu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ümit Topaloĝlu Line = papers co-authored together Ümit Topaloĝlu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 103 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Using a Federated Network of Real-World Data to Optimize Clinical Trials Operations
Hit paper breakdown →
2018219
2 2012192
3 2019114
4 200784
5 200777
6 201776
7 202174
8 202269
9 200754
10 202153
11 201451
12 202047
13 201847
14 200846
15 201142
16 202233
17 202032
18 201931
19 202131
20 201131

About Ümit Topaloĝlu

Ümit Topaloĝlu is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Artificial Intelligence, Surgery, Oncology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 103 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (11 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (7 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (7 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (6 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (5 papers), Cryptography and Data Security (4 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (4 papers) and Semantic Web and Ontologies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (34 citations), Toxicology (80 citations), Health Information Management (84 citations), Oncology (286 citations) and Cancer Research (153 citations). Ümit Topaloĝlu has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Türkiye and China. Frequent co-authors include Matvey B. Palchuk, Jiang Bian, Ender Dulundu, Göksel Şener, Feri̇ha Ercan, Erkan Özkan, Özer Şehırlı, Boris Pasche, Nursal Gedik and Suraj Rajendran. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics, Surgery Today, Cancers and Learning Health Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact