Irish Educational Studies

900 papers and 5.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 900 papers published in Irish Educational Studies in the last decades have received a total of 5.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Irish Educational Studies usually cover Education (632 papers), Sociology and Political Science (217 papers) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (106 papers) specifically the topics of Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (127 papers), Education Systems and Policy (118 papers) and Religious Education and Schools (101 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Irish Educational Studies are Jim Gleeson, Manuela Heinz, Karl Kitching, Paul Conway, Elaine Keane, Oliver McGarr, Declan Fahie, Dympna Devine, Mary Moloney and Selina McCoy.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Irish Educational Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Irish Educational Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Irish Educational Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Irish Educational Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Irish Educational Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Irish Educational Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Irish Educational Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025