Journal of Medical Humanities

728 papers and 4.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 728 papers published in Journal of Medical Humanities in the last decades have received a total of 4.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Medical Humanities usually cover Psychiatry and Mental health (206 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (125 papers) and General Health Professions (125 papers) specifically the topics of Empathy and Medical Education (200 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (77 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (50 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Medical Humanities are Bradley Lewis, Barbara E. Gibson, Gail Landsman, Joseph Dumit, Alan Petersen, Howard Brody, Helen Keane, Michael J. Green, Jane M. Ussher and Judy Z. Segal.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Medical Humanities

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Medical Humanities. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Medical Humanities.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Medical Humanities

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Medical Humanities. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Medical Humanities with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Medical Humanities more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025