Hokkaido Mathematical Journal

1.3k papers and 8.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Hokkaido Mathematical Journal in the last decades have received a total of 8.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Hokkaido Mathematical Journal usually cover Applied Mathematics (512 papers), Mathematical Physics (461 papers) and Geometry and Topology (400 papers) specifically the topics of Optimal Transport in Geometry and Analysis (165 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (127 papers) and advanced mathematical theories (98 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Hokkaido Mathematical Journal are Alan Weinstein, Yasushi Shizuta, Shuichi Kawashima, Noboru Tanaka, Yôichi Miyashita, Hermann Sohr, Rentarô Agemi, Kiyoichi Oshiro, Wolfgang Borchers and Kôji Kubota.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Hokkaido Mathematical Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Hokkaido Mathematical Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Hokkaido Mathematical Journal.

Countries where authors publish in Hokkaido Mathematical Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Hokkaido Mathematical Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Hokkaido Mathematical Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hokkaido Mathematical Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025