Countries where authors publish in Politics & Policy
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Politics & Policy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Politics & Policy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Politics & Policy more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Politics & Policy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Politics & Policy.
About Politics & Policy
The 929 papers published in Politics & Policy in the last decades have received a total of 7.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Politics & Policy usually cover Public Administration (85 papers), Political Science and International Relations (562 papers), Development (63 papers), Communication (84 papers) and Gender Studies (87 papers) specifically the topics of Electoral Systems and Political Participation (259 papers), Policy Transfer and Learning (102 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (93 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (90 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (76 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (73 papers), Social Media and Politics (71 papers) and International Development and Aid (63 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Politics & Policy are Tatiana Kostadinova, Imran Awan, Simplice Asongu, John C. Morris, Riccardo Pelizzo, Basia Spalek, Gregory B. Lewis, Mark K. McBeth, Farida Jalalzai and Heike Holbig.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.